This is a repository copy of Why Symbolic Representation Frames Parliamentary

TエW UK P;ヴノキ;マWミデげゲ ;Iデキ┗キデ┞ キミ ヮ┌HノキI Wミェ;ェWマWミデ エ;ゲ ヴWIWミデノ┞ W┝ヮ;ミSWS IラミゲキSWヴ;Hノ┞く F;IWS ┘キデエ declining levels of trust, it has invested considerable time and resources to new activities focusing specifically on engagement: educational resources and cultural events among many others. This embodies a new role for parliament of increasing importance particularly in the context of the twentyfirst century parliament. This article analyses the aims of public engagement and its consequences for representation. We explore the potential representative role of public engagement, identifying key changes that have affected the relationship between public and parliament. We utilise evidence from documentary analysis and elite in-depth interviews with parliamentary officials to show that public engagement planning aims to develop amongst the public a sense of connectivity that relies on more collective and symbolic forms of representation, which seek to present the institution detached from its actors and politics. We utilise constructivist representation theories to support our analysis.